THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA; RUSSIA AND THE KHAZARS

 

Excerpt from the Phoenix-Journal 76: SORTING THE PIECES – RELATIVE CONNECTIONS VOL. IV

 

CHAPTER 5

REC #2 HATONN

SAT., AUG. 7, 1993 2:49 P.M. YEAR 6, DAY 356

SAT., AUGUST 7, 1993

 

RUSSIA AND THE KHAZARS

Yep, here it comes AGAIN! Aren’t we ever going to be through with this noxious subject? NO!

 

This is the next in the series from The Iron Curtain Over America:

Having traced the Knighthood of Teutonic Order from its origin to its dissolution as a military-religious brotherhood, and having noted the development of successor sovereignties down to the obliteration of Prussia in 1945, we must turn back more than a thousand years to examine another thread–a scarlet one–in the tangled skein of European history.

In the later years of the dimly recorded first millennium of the Christian era, Slavic people of several kindred tribes occupied the land which became known later as the north central portion of European Russia. South of them between the Don and Volga Rivers and north of the lofty Caucasus Mountains lived a people known to history as Khazars. These people had been driven westward from Central Asia and entered Europe by the corridor between the Ural Mountains and the Caspian Sea. They found a land occupied by primitive pastoral people of a score or more of tribes, a land which lay beyond the boundaries of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent under Trajan (ruled 98-117 A.D.), and also beyond the boundaries of the Byzantine Empire (395-1453). By slow stages the Khazars extended their territory eventually to the Sea of Azov and the adjacent littoral of the Black Sea. The Khazars were apparently a people of mixed stock with Mongol and Turkic affinities. Around the year 600, a belligerent tribe of half-Mongolian people, similar to the modern Turks, conquered the territory of what is now Southern Russia. Before long the kingdom [khanate] of the Khazars, as this tribe was known, stretched from the Caspian to the Black Sea. Its capital, Ityl, was at the mouth of the Volga River. [H: I want YOU to know that this information is not only verified by the “Jews” but is presented in the History of the Jews, by Solomon Grayzel, Philadelphia–The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947. I stress this so my scribe and Nora don’t get drawn and quartered by the Zionists of TODAY who claim there are no such things as “Khazars”.]

In the eighth or ninth century of our era, a khakan (or chagan, roughly equivalent to tribal chief or primitive king) of the Khazars wanted a religion for his pagan people. Partly, perhaps because of incipient tension between Christians and the adherents of the new Mohammedan faith (Mohammed died in 632), and partly because of fear of becoming subject to the power of the Byzantine emperor or the Islamic caliph, he adopted a form of the Jewish religion at a date generally placed at c. 741 A.D., but believed by historian Vernadsky to be as late as 865. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. VI, pp. 375377), this chieftain, probably Bulan, “called upon the representatives of Judaism, Christianity and Mohammedanism to expound their doctrines before him. This discussion convinced him that the Jewish faith was the most preferable, and he decided to embrace it. Thereupon he and about 4,000 Khazars were circumcised; it was only by degrees that the Jewish teachings gained a foothold among the population.”

In his History of the Jews, (The Jewish Publication Society of America, Vol. III, 1894, pp. 140-141), Professor H. Graetz gives further details:

A successor of Bulan, who bore the Hebrew name of Obadiah, was the first to make serious efforts to further the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish sages to settle in his dominions, rewarded them royally, founded synagogues and schools…caused instruction to be given to himself and his people in the Bible and the Talmud, and introduced a divine service modeled on the ancient communities.

After Obadiah came a long series of Jewish chagans, for according to a fundamental law of the state ONLY Jewish rulers were permitted to ascend the throne.

The significance of the term “ancient communities” cannot be here explained. For a suggestion of the “incorrect exposition” and the “tasteless misrepresentation” with which the Bible, i.e., the Old Testament, was presented through the Talmud, see below in this chapter, the extensive quotation from Professor Graetz.

Also in the Middle Ages, Viking warriors, according to Russian tradition by invitation, pushed from the Baltic area into the low hills west of Moscow. Archaeological discoveries show that at one time or another these Northmen penetrated almost all areas south of Lake Ladoga and West of the Kama and Lower Volga rivers. Their earliest, and permanent, settlements were north and east of the West Dwina River, in the Lake Ilmen area, and between the Upper Volga and Oka rivers, at whose junction they soon held the famous trading-post of Nizhniy-Novgorod.

These immigrants from the North and West were principally “the ‘Rus’–a Varangian tribe in ancient annals considered as related to the Swedes, Angles, and Northmen” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. XIX, p. 712). From the local Slavic tribes, they organized (c.862) a state, known subsequently from their name as Russia, which embraced the territory of the upper Volga and Dnieper rivers and reached down the latter river to the Black Sea and to the Crimea. Russ and Slav were of related stock and their languages, though quite different, had common Indo-Germanic origin. They accepted Christianity as their religion. Greek Orthodox missionaries, sent to Rus [i.e. “Russia”] in the 860’s baptized so many people that shortly after this a special bishop was sent to care for their needs.

The “Rus” (or “Russ”) were absorbed into the Slav population which they organized into statehood. The people of the new state devoted themselves energetically to consolidating their territory and extending its boundaries. From the Khazars, who had extended their power up the Dnieper Valley, they took Kiev, which was an important trading center even before becoming, in the 10th century, the capital of a large recently Christianized state. Many Varangians (Rus) had settled among the Slays in this area (the Ukraine), and Christian Kiev became the seat of an enlightened Westward-looking dynasty, whose members married into several European royal houses, including that of France.

The Slays, especially those in the area now known as the Ukraine, were engaged in almost constant warfare with the Khazars and finally, by 1016 A.D., destroyed the Khazar government and took a large portion of Khazar territory. For the gradual shrinking of the Khazar territory and the development of Poland, Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Moscow, and other Slavic states, see the pertinent maps in Historical Atlas, by William R. Shepherd (Henry Holt and Co., New York, 1911). Some of the subjugated Khazars remained in the Slav-held lands their khakans had long ruled, and others migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia, probably to a considerable extent because of the dislocations wrought by the Mongols under Genghis Khan (1162-1227), who founded in and beyond the old Khazar khanate the short-lived khanate of the Golden Horde. The Judaized Khazars underwent further dispersion both northwestward into Lithuanian and Polish areas, and also within Russia proper and the Ukraine. In 1240 in Kiev the Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members finding refuge in towns further west along with the fleeing Russians, when the capital fell to the Mongol soldiers of Batu, the nephew of Genghis Khan. A short time later many of these expelled Jews returned to Kiev. Migrating thus, as some local power impelled them, the Khazar Jews became widely distributed in Western Russia. Into the Khazar khanate there had been a few Jewish immigrants–rabbis, traders, refugees–but the people of the Kievan Russian state did not facilitate the entry of additional Jews into their territory. The rulers of the Grand Duchy of Moscow also sought to exclude: Jews from areas under its control. From its earliest times the policy of the Russian government was that of complete exclusion of the Jews from its territories. For instance, Ivan IV (reign, 1533-1584) refused to allow Jewish merchants to travel in, Russia.

Relations between Slays and the Judaized Khazars in their midst were never happy. The reasons were not racial–for the Slays had absorbed many minorities–but were ideological. The rabbis sent for by Khakan Obadiah were educated in and were zealots for the Babylonian Talmud, which after long labors by many hands had been completed on December 2, 499. In the thousands of synagogues which were built in the Khazar khanate, the imported rabbis and their successors were in complete control of the political, social, and religious thought of their people. So significant was the Babylonian Talmud as the principal cause of Khazar resistance to Russian efforts to end their political and religious separatism, and so significant also are the modern sequels, including those in the United States, that an extensive quotation on the subject from the great History of the Jews, by Professor H. Graetz (Vol. II, 1893, pp. 631 ff.) is here presented:

The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it possesses absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws.

The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian birthplace which presume the efficacy of demonical medicines, of magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams. It also contains isolated instances of uncharitable judgments and decrees against the members of other nations and religions, and finally it favors an incorrect exposition of the scriptures, accepting, as it does, tasteless misrepresentations.

More than six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud. Small wonder then, that the sublime and the common, the great and the small, the grave and the ridiculous, the altar and the ashes, the Jewish and the heathenish, be discovered side by side.

The Babylonian Talmud is especially distinguished from the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again. It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than the Jerusalem Talmud became the fundamental possession of the Jewish race, its life breath, its very soul–nature and mankind, powers and events, were for the Jewish nation insignificant, non-essential, a mere phantom; the only true reality was the Talmud.

Not merely educated by the Talmud but actually living the life of its Babylonian background, which they may have regarded with increased devotion because most of the Jews of Mesopotamia [H: Ah–getting very close to “Sumar”!] had embraced Islam, the rabbi-governed Khazars had no intention whatever of losing their identity by becoming Russianized or Christian. The intransigent attitude of the rabbis was increased by their realization that their power would be lost if their people accepted controls other than Talmudic. These controls by rabbis were responsible not only for basic mores, but for such externals as the peculiarities of dress and hair. It has been frequently stated by writers on the subject that the “ghetto” was the work not of Russians or other Slays but of rabbis.

As time passed, it came about that these Khazar people of mixed non-Russian stock, who hated the Russians and lived under Babylonian Talmudic law, became known in the western world, from their place of residence and their legal-religious code, as Russian Jews.

In Russian lands after the fall of Kiev in 1240, there was a period of dissension and disunity. The struggle with the Mongols and other Asiatic khanates continued and from them the Russians learned much about effective military organization. Also, as the Mongols had not overrun Northern and Western Russia, there was a background for the resistance and counter-offensive which gradually eliminated the invaders. The capital of reorganized Russia was no longer Kiev but Moscow (hence the terms Moscovy and Muscovite). In 1613 the Russian nobles (boyars), desired a more stable government than they had had, and elected as their czar a boy named Michael Romanov [H: Oops, I’ve gone and done it now!], whose veins carried the blood of the grand dukes of Kiev and the grand dukes of Moscow.

Under the Romanovs of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there was no change in attitude toward the Judaized Khazars, who scorned Russian civilization and stubbornly re-fused to enter the fold of Christianity. [: Ah, staff, please locate my presentation on the Russian Romanovs, please–I promised more and simply haven’t found “time” to offer it–it is going to be IMPORTANT IN HISTORICAL HAPPENINGS. (See end of chapter page 86. This was excerpted from the PHOENIX JOURNAL #58 FROM THE FRYING PAN INTO THE PIT OF FIRE.)] Peter the Great [reign, 1682-1725] spoke of the Jews as ‘rogues and cheats’. Elizabeth [reign, 1741-1762] expressed her attitude in the sentence: “From the enemies of Christ, I desire neither gain nor profit.” With the expansion of Russia in the last half of the eighteenth century, many additional Jews were acquired with the new territory, especially in Russia’s portion of divided Poland (1772, 1793, 1795). The Empress, Catherine II [reign, 1762-1796] had no choice but to receive the Jews along with the other inhabitants of the land, but she created out of the provinces taken from Poland a “Pale of Settlement” from which the newly acquired Jews could not move. As before, from that time on the attitude of the government was to hem in the Jews as much as possible.

Under the Romanov dynasty (1613-1917 [Bolshevik Revolution]) many members of the Russian upper classes were educated in Germany, and the Russian nobility, already partly Scandinavian by blood, frequently married Germans or other Western Europeans. Likewise many of the Romanovs, themselves–in fact all of them who ruled in the later years of the dy-nasty–married into Western families. Prior to the nineteenth century the two occupants of the Russian throne best known in world history were Peter I, the Great, and Catherine II, the Great. The former–who in 1703 gave Russia its “West Window”, St. Petersburg, later known as Petrograd, and recently as Leningrad–chose as his consort and successor on the throne as Catherine I [reign, 1725-1727], a captured Marienburg (Germany) servant girl whose mother and father were respectively a Lithuanian peasant woman and a Swedish dragoon. Catherine II, the Great, was a German princess who was proclaimed reigning Empress of Russia after her husband, the ineffective Czar Peter HI, subnormal in mind and physique, left St. Petersburg. During her thirty-four years as Empress, Catherine, by studying such works as Blackstone’s Commentaries, and by correspondence with such illustrious persons as Voltaire [H: Remember that along with Voltaire’s other contributions–he had translated, NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA.], F.M. Grimm [H: Nora has done a beautiful study of “Grimm”], Frederick the Great, Diderot, and Maria-Theresa of Austria, kept herself in contact with the West.

The nineteenth century czars were Catherine the Great’s grandson, Alexander I [reign, 1801-1825–German wife]; his brother, Nicholas I [reign, 1825-1855–German wife, a Hohenzollern]; his son, Alexander II [reign, 1855-1881–German wife]; his son, Alexander III [reign, 1881-1894–Danish wife]; and his son, Nicholas II [reign, 1894-1917–German wife], who was murdered with his family (1918) after the Communists seized power (1917) in Russia. [H: And since history has now PROVEN that “COMMUNISM” is a construction of Jewish Zionists and that ALL of the government heads in new Communistic Russia after that Revolution were Jewish Zionists–what do we have to face here, readers?]

Though many of the Romanovs, including Peter I and Catherine II, had far from admirable characters–a fact well advertised in American books on the subject–and though some of them including Nicholas II were not able rulers, a general purpose of the dynasty was to give their land certain of the advantages of Western Europe. In the West they characteristically sought alliances with one country or another, rather than ideological penetration.

Like their Slavic overlords, the Judaized Khazars of Russia had various relationships with Germany. Their numbers from time to time, as during the Crusades, received accretions from the Jewish communities in Germany–principally into Poland and other areas not yet Russian; many of the ancestors of these people, however, had previously entered Germany from Slavic lands. More interesting than these migrations was the importation from Germany of an idea conceived by a prominent Jew of solving century-old tension between native majority populations and the Jews in their midst. In Germany, while Catherine the Great was Empress of Russia, a Jewish scholar and philosopher named Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786) attracted wide and favorable attention among non-Jews and a certain following among Jews. His conception of the barrier between Jew and non-Jew, as analyzed by Grayzel, was that the “Jews had erected about themselves a mental ghetto to balance the physical ghetto around them.” Mendelssohn’s objective was to lead the Jews out of this mental ghetto into the wide world of general culture–without, however, doing harm to their specifically Jewish culture. The movement received the name Haskalah, which may be rendered as enlightenment. Among other things, Mendelssohn wished Jews in Germany to learn the German language.

The Jews of Eastern Europe had from early days used corrupted versions of local vernaculars, written in the Hebrew alphabet just as the various vernaculars of Western Europe were written in the Latin alphabet, and to further his purpose Mendelssohn translated the Pentateuch–Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy–into standard German, using however, the accepted Hebrew alphabet. [H: How many of you KNEW this? If you didn’t know THIS, then I ask that you read on and perhaps find that there are a lot of things you may well have not known. Further, there isn’t going to be a “preacher” in any Christian pulpit who will tell you this. Why? Because he will not have been allowed to LEARN this type of information in his “Judeo-Christian” seminary, my dear blind lambs!] Thus in one stroke he led his readers a step toward Westernization by the use of the German language and by offering them, instead of the Babylonian Talmud, a portion of scripture recognized by both Jew and Christian.

The Mendelssohn views were developed in Russia in the nineteenth century, notably by Isaac Baer Levinsohn (17881860), the Russian Mendelssohn. Levinsohn was a scholar who, with Abraham Harkavy, delved into a field of Jewish history little known in the West, namely the settlement of Jews in Russia and their vicissitudes during the Dark Ages. Levinsohn was the first to express the opinion that the Russian Jews hailed not from Germany, as is commonly supposed, but from the banks of the Volga. This hypothesis, corroborated by tradition, Harkavy established as a fact.

The reigns of the nineteenth century Czars showed a fluctuation of attitudes toward the Jewish state within a state. In general, Nicholas I had been less lenient than Alexander I toward his intractable non-Christian minority, but he took an immediate interest in the movement endorsed by the highly respected Levinsohn, for he saw in “Haskalah” an opportunity for possibly breaking down the separatism of the Judaized Khazars. He put in charge of the project of opening hundreds of Jewish schools a brilliant young Jew, Dr. Max Lilienthal. From its beginning, however, the haskalah movement had had bitter opposition among Jews in Germany–many of whom, including the famous Moses Hess, became ardent Jewish nationalists–and in Russia the opposition was fanatical. The great mass of Russian Jewry was devoid of all secular learning, steeped in fanaticism, and given to superstitious practices, and their leaders, for the most part, had no notion of tolerating a project which would lessen or destroy their control. These leaders believed correctly that the new education was designed to lessen the authority of the Talmud, which was the cause, as the Russians saw it, of the fanaticism and corrupt morals of the Jews. The leaders of the Jews also saw that the new schools were a way to bring the Jews closer to the Russian people and the Greek church. According to historian Raisin, the millions of Russian Jews were averse to having the government interfere with their inner and spiritual life by foisting upon them its educational measures. The soul of Russian Jewry sensed the danger lurking in the imperial scheme. Lilienthal was in their eyes a traitor and informer, and in 1845, to recover a modicum of prestige with his people, he shook the dust of bloody Russia from his feet. Thus the Haskalah movement failed in Russia to break down the separatism of the Judaized Khazars.

When Nicholas I died, his son Alexander II [reign, 1855-1881] decided to try a new way of winning the Khazar minority to willing citizenship in Russia. He granted his people, including the Khazars, so many liberties that he was called the Czar Liberator.

By irony, or nemesis, however, his liberal regime contributed substantially to the downfall of Christian Russia. Despite the ill-success of his Uncle Alexander’s measures to effect the betterment of the obnoxious Jewish element he ordered a wholesale relaxation of oppressive and restraining regulations and Jews were free to attend all schools and universities and to travel without restrictions. The new freedom led, however, to results the “Liberator” had not anticipated.

Educated, and free at last to organize nationally, the Judaized Khazars in Russia became not merely an indigestible mass in the body politic, the characteristic state within a state, but a formidable anti-government force. With non-Jews of nihilistic or other radical tendencies–the so-called Russian intelligentsia–they sought in the first instance to further their aims by assassinations. Alexander tried to abate the hostility of the “terrorists” by granting more and more concessions, but on the day the last concessions were announced a bomb was thrown at his carriage. The carriage was wrecked, and many of his escorts were injured. Alexander escaped as by a miracle, but a second bomb exploded near him as he was going to aid the injured. He was horribly mangled, and died within an hour. Thus perished the Czar Liberator. [H: Never seems to change does it?]

Some of those involved in earlier attempts to assassinate Alexander II were of Jewish Khazar background. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, the assassination of Alexander II in which a Jewess had played a part revived a latent “anti-Semitism”. Resentful of precautions taken by the murdered Czar’s son and successor, Alexander III, and also possessing a new world plan, hordes of Jews, some of them highly educated in Russian universities, migrated to other European countries and to America. The emigration continued under Nicholas II. Many Jews remained in Russia, however, for in 1913 the Jewish population of Russia amounted to 6,946,000. [H: Still think the “Holocaust” could have happened as the Jews say??? Remember, in 1991 the number of Jews killed in the death camps ROSE (by Jewish insistence) to 6 million 500 thousand!! Now, how do you equate that number with the NUMBER WHO GET RESTITUTION FROM THE GERMANS RIGHT NOW!?! Hey, don’t throw stones at ME–this number came directly from Univ. Jew. Encyc., Vol. IX, p.285.]

Various elements of this restless aggressive minority nurtured the amazing quadruple aims of international Communism, the seizure of power in Russia, Zionism, and continued migration to America, with a fixed purpose to retain their nationalistic separatism. In many instances, the same individuals were participants in two or more phases of the four-fold objective.

Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included Lithuania, the Ukraine, and much of Poland, were the founders of the Russian Bolshevik party: [H: Finally made it!]

In 1897 was founded the Bund, the union of Jewish workers in Poland and Lithuania. They engaged in revolutionary activity upon a large scale, and their energy made them the spearhead of the party (Article on “Communism” by Harold J. Laski, Encyc. Brit. , Vol. III, pp 824-827).

 

BOLSHEVIKI

The name “Bolsheviki” means majority (from Russian bolshe, the larger) and commemorates the fact that at the Brussels-London conference of the party in late 1902 and early 1903, the violent Marxist program of Lenin was adopted by a 25 to 23 vote, the less violent minority of “Mensheviki” Marxists fading finally from the picture after Stalin’s triumph in October, 1917. It has been also stated that the term Bolshevik refers to the “larger” or more violent program of the majority faction. After 1918 the Bolsheviki called their organization the Communist Party.

 

ZIONIST JEWS

The Zionist Jews were another group that laid its plan in Russia as a part of the new reorientation of Russian Jewry after the collapse of Haskalah and the assassination (1881) of Alexander II. On November 6, 1884, for the first time in history, a Jewish international assembly was held at Kattowitz, near the Russian frontier, where representatives from all classes and different countries met and decided to colonize Palestine. Henceforth a heightened sense of race-consciousness takes the place formerly held by religion and is soon to develop into a concrete nationalism with Zion as its goal.

In Russia and abroad in the late nineteenth century, not only Bundists but other Khazar Jews had been attracted to the workings of Karl Marx (1818-1883), partly, it seems, because he was Jewish in origin. On both paternal and maternal sides Karl Marx was descended from rabbinical families.

The Marxian program of drastic controls, so repugnant to the free western mind, was no obstacle to the acceptance of Marxism by many Khazar Jews, for the Babylonian Talmud under which they lived had taught them to accept authoritarian dictation on everything from their immorality to their trade practices. Since the Talmud contained more than 12,000 controls, the regimentation of Marxism was acceptable–provided the Khazar politician, like the Talmudic Rabbi, exercised the power of the dictatorship.

Under Nicholas II, there was no abatement of the regulations designed, after the murder of Alexander II, to curb the anti-government activities of Jews; consequently, the reaction to those excesses was Jewish support of the Bolsheviks. The way to such support was easy since the predecessor organization of Russian Communism was the Jewish “Bund”. Thus Marxian Communism, modified for expediency, became an instrument for the violent seizure of power. The Communist Jews, together with revolutionaries of Russian stock, were sufficiently numerous to give the venture a promise of success, if attempted at the right time. After the rout of the less violent faction in 1903, when Czar Nicholas’s train was stopped and he was told that his rule was at an end…Israel, in Russia, suddenly found itself lifted out of its oppression and degradation.

At this moment Lenin appeared on the scene, after an absence of nine years. The Germans, not realizing that he would be anything more than a trouble-maker for their World War I enemy, Russia, passed him and his party (exact number disputed–about 200?) in a sealed train from Switzerland to the Russian border. In Lenin’s sealed train, out of a list of 165 names published, 23 are Russian, 3 Georgian, 4 Armenian, 1 German, and 128 Jewish. At about the same time, Trotsky arrived from the United States, followed by over 300 Jews from the East End of New York and joined up with the Bolshevik Party.

Thus under Lenin, whose birth-name was Ulianov and whose racial antecedents are uncertain, and under Leon Trotsky, a Jew, whose birth-name was Bronstein, a small number of highly-trained Jews from abroad, along with Russian Judaized Khazars and non-Jewish origin–such as Trotsky, Zinoniev, Kamanev, and Sverdlov–played a conspicuous part in the revolution of November 1917, which enabled the Bolshevists to take possession of the state apparatus. Here and there in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia other Jews are named as co-founders of Russian Communism [H: Yes, you read that correctly–in THE UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCLCYCLOPEDIA!], but not Lenin and Stalin. Both of these, however, are said by some writers to be half-Jewish. [H: Not only is this true but BOTH bore Jewish sir-names prior to changing.] Whatever the racial antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet commissariats were largely staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the Communist movement was well understood in Russia. The “White Armies” which opposed the Bolshevik government linked Jews and Bolsheviks as common enemies. (This also comes from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 336.)

Those interested in the ratio of Jews to others in the government in the early days of Communist rule in Russia should, if possible, see Les derniers fours des Romanof (The Last Days of the Romanovs) by Robert Wilton, long the Russian correspondent of the London Times. A summary of its vital passages is included in the “foreword” to the Third Edition of the Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, by Rev. Dennis Fahey, a well-known Irish professor of philosophy and Church history. Professor Fahey gives names and nationality of the members of the Council of Peoples Commissars, the Central Executive Committee, and the Extraordinary Commissions, and in summary quotes from Wilton as follows:

According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State… there were in 1918-1919, 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Karaim, and 457 JEWS.

As the decades passed by–after the fateful year 1917–Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia. In due time they built a bu-reaucracy to their hearts’ desire. The government-controlled Communist press issued numerous and violent denunciations of anti-semitic episodes, either violence or discriminations. Also, in 1935 a court ruled that anti-semitism in Russia was a penal offense. Among top-flight leaders prominent in the middle of the twentieth century, Stalin, Kaganovich, Beria, Molotov, and Litvinoff all have Jewish blood, or are married to Jewesses. The latter circumstance should not be overlooked that the influence of a certain type of wife–or other closely associated woman–has been of utmost significance and is well written up in many documents. If you want facts for self there are many books on the subject but we especially recommend Section III, 11, entitled Raymond Boyer, Montreal, in the Report of the Canadian Royal Commission. This should be read in full by all who want facts on the subject of the corruption of scientists, and others working on government projects. In the Soviet Embassy records, turned over to Canadian authorities by Ivor Gouzenko, was Col. Zabotin’s notebook which contained the following entries (pp. 375 and 397 respectively):

Professor

Frenchman. Noted chemist, about 40 years of age. Works in McGill University, Montreal. Is the best of the specialists on VV on the American Continent. Gives full information on explosives and chemical plants. Very rich. He is afraid to work. (Gave the formula of RDX, up to the present there was no evaluation from the boss.)

Contact

1. Freda

Jewess–works as a co-worker in the International Bureau of Labour.

A lady friend of the Professor.

In view of the facts furnished as to the racial composition of the early Communist bureaucracy, it is perhaps not surprising that a large portion of the important foreign efforts of the present government of Russia are entrusted to Jews.

This is especially notable in the list of current or recent exercisers of Soviet power in the satellite lands of Eastern Europe. Anna Rabinsohn Pauker, Dictator of Rumania; Matyas Rakosi, Dictator of Hungary; Jacob Berman, Dictator of Poland; D.M. Manuilsky, Dictator of the Ukraine; and many other persons highly placed in the governments of the several Eastern European countries are all said to be members of this new Royal Race of Russia.

Of Eastern European origin are the leaders of the late nineteenth century and twentieth century political Zionism which flowered from the already recorded beginnings at Kattowitz in 1884. Born at Budapest, Hungary, was Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), author (1896) of Der Judenstaat (The Jews’ State), who presided over the “Zionist Congress”, which took place in Basel, Switzerland on August 29, 30, and 31, 1897 (Univ. Jew. Encyc., Vol II, p. 102). Dr. Chaim Weizmann, the head of political Zionism at the moment of its recourse to violence, was born in Plonsk, Poland. Since these top leaders are Eastern Europeans, it is not surprising that most of the recent immigrants into Palestine are of Soviet and satellite origin and that their weapons have been largely from the Soviet Union and from Soviet-controlled Czechoslovakia.

As a number of writers have pointed out, political Zionism entered its violent phase after the discovery of the incredibly vast mineral wealth of Palestine. According to Zionists Mis-leading World with Untruths for Palestine Conquest, a full-page article inserted as an advertisement in the New York Herald-Tribune (Jan. 14, 1947), an independent Jewish state in Palestine was the only certain method by which Zionists could acquire complete control and outright ownership of the proven Five Trillion Dollar ($5,000,000,000,000) chemical and mineral wealth of the Dead Sea. The long documented article is signed by R.M. Schoendorf, Representative of Cooperating Americans of the Christian Faiths; by Habib I. Katibah, Representative of Cooperating Americans of Arab Ancestry; and by Benjamin H. Freedman, Representative of Cooperating Americans of the Jewish Faith, and is convincing. Irrespective, however, of the value of the Dead Sea minerals, the oil flow of Middle Eastern wells is something unbelievable to those familiar with slow-flowing American wells. Also in 1951, oil was discovered in the Negeb Desert, an area for which the Israeli authorities had so much fervor that they seized it.

The dominance of the motive of self-aggrandizement in political Zionism has been affirmed and denied; but it is difficult for an observer to see any possible objective apart from mineral wealth or long range grand strategy, including aggression, in a proposal to make a nation out of an agriculturally poor, already overpopulated territory the size of Vermont. The intention of aggression at the expense of Moslem peoples, particularly in the direction of Iraq and Iran, is suggested also by the fact that the Eastern European Jews, adherents to the Babylonian Talmud, had long turned their thoughts to the lands where their sages lived and where most of the native Jewish population had embraced the Moslem faith. [H: Oops! Watch it, for now we are getting into ANCIENT history, readers. The enemy has ALWAYS been afoot in “places of the Lion”.] Any possible Zionist religious motive such as the hope of heaven, which fired the zeal of the Crusaders, is apparently ruled out by the nature of Judaism, as it is generally understood. The Jewish religion is a way of life and has no formulated creed, or articles of faith, the acceptance of which brings redemption or salvation to the believer.

* * *

Scribe, I need you elsewhere for a little “time” so please close this “chapter”. We will pick up a bit later, please, here with the underground overseas efforts of the Khazar-dominated Russia.

 

 

Continuation: We were speaking of the underground efforts of Khazar-dominated Russia being entrusted principally to Jews so let us simply take up where we left off and run with it.

BE EVER MINDFUL THAT SINCE WE HAVE NO COPYRIGHTS IN THIS BOOK WE CAN ONLY DEDUCE THAT THE VOLUME WAS WRITTEN IN ABOUT 1952 OR (THE EARLY 1950s) SOME 40-YEARS AGO! WHERE ARE YOU TODAY?

 

KHAZAR-DOMINATED RUSSIA–AND JEWS

The secret or underground overseas efforts of Khazar-dominated Russia apparently have been entrusted principally to Jews. This is especially true of atomic espionage. The Report of the Royal Commission of Canada, already referred to, shows that Sam Car (Cohen), organizer for all Canada; Fred Rose (Rosenberg), organizer for French Canada, and member of the Canadian Parliament from a Montreal constituency; and Germina (or Hermina) Rabinowich, in charge of liaison with U.S. Communists, were all born in Russia or satellite lands. In this connection, it is important to stress the fact that the possession of a Western name does not necessarily imply Western European stock. In fact, the maneuver of name-changing frequently disguises an individual’s stock or origin. Thus the birth-name of John Gates, editor of the Communist Daily Worker was Israel Regenstreif. Other name changers among the eleven Communists found guilty by a New York jury in October, 1949, included Gil Green–born Greenberg; Gus Hall–born Halberg; and Carl Winter–born Weissberg. (For details on these men and the others, see the article, “The Trial of the Eleven Communists”, by Sidney Shalett, Reader’s Digest, August, 1950, pp. 59-72.) Other examples of name-changing can be cited among political writers, army officers, and prominent officials in the executive agencies and departments in Washington. Parenthetically, the maneuver of acquiring a name easily acceptable to the majority was very widely practiced by the aliens prominent in the seizure of Russia for Communism, among the name-changers being Lenin (Ulianov), Trotsky (Bronstein), and Stalin (Dzugashvili), the principal founders of state Communism. [H: How many of you realize this? How many of you ever DREAMED in your wildest nightmares that Lenin and Stalin were JEWS? PONDER IT–WHAT ELSE DO YOU NOT KNOW?]

The United States Government refused Canada’s invitation early in 1946 to cooperate in Canada’s investigation of atomic spies, but in 1950 when (despite “red herring” talk of the Chief Executive) our atomic spy suspects began to be apprehended, the first was Harry Gold, then Abraham Brothman, and Miriam Moskowitz. Other were M. Sobell, David Greenglass, Julius Rosenberg, and Mrs. Ethel Rosenberg (not to be confused with Mrs. Anna Rosenberg). Various sentences were given. Mr. and Mrs. Rosenberg received the death penalty. As of early May, 1952, however, the sentence had not been carried out and a significant portion of the Jewish press was campaigning to save the Rosenbergs. Referring to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Samuel B. Gach, Editor-in-Chief and Publisher of the California Jewish Voice (Largest Jewish Circulation in the West) wrote as follows in his issue of April 25, 1952: “We deplore the sentence against the two Jews and despise the cowardly Jewish judge who passed same….” In March, 1951, Dr. William Perl of the Columbia University Physics Department was arrested “on four counts of perjury in connection with the crumbling Soviet atomic spy ring. . . Perl whose father was born in Russia,…had his name changed from Utterperl (Mutterperl?) to Perl” in 1945. For further details on these persons and others, see Atomic Traitors, by Congressman Fred Busbey of Illinois in the June, 1951, number of National Republic. Finally, the true head of Communism in America was found not to be the publicly announced head, but the Jew, Gerhardt Eisler, who, upon detection, “escaped” from America on the Polish S.S. “Batory”, to a high position in the Soviet Government of East Germany.

Very pertinent to the subject under consideration is a statement entitled “Displaced Persons: Facts vs. Fiction”, made in the Senate of the United States on January 6, 1950, by Senator Pat McCarran, Democrat of Nevada, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Senator McCarran said in part: “Let it be remembered that the Attorney General of the United States recently testified that an analysis of 4,984 of the more militant members of the Communist Party in the United States showed that 91.4 percent of the total were of foreign stock or were married to persons of foreign stock.”

With more than nine-tenths of our “more militant” Communists thus recruited from or allied to “foreign stock” and with that “stock” totaling perhaps not more than 10,000,000 or one-fifteenth of our nation’s population, a little recourse to mathematics will suggest that the employment of an Eastern European or other person of recent alien extraction or connection is one hundred and fifty times more likely to yield a traitor than is the employment of a person of native stock!

An “authoritative” Jewish point of view toward Soviet Russia is explained in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia in the concluding paragraphs on Karl Marx. According to this source, Jews “recognize the experience of the Soviet Union, home of 6,000,0000 Jews, as testimony of the Marxist position on the question of national and racial equality.” The Encyclopedia comments further on the “striking fact that the one country which professes official allegiance to Marxian teachings is the one where anti-Semitism has been outlawed and its resurgence rendered impossible by the removal of social and economic inequalities.” In The Jewish People Face the Post-War World by Alexander Bittleman, the affection of a considerable body of American Jews for the Soviet Union is expressed dramatically:

If not for the Red Army, there would be no Jews in Europe today, nor in Palestine, nor in Africa; and in the United States, the length of our existence would be counted in days…. THE SOVIET UNION HAS SAVED THE JEWISH PEOPLE. Therefore, let the American Jewish masses never forget our historic debt to the Saviour of the Jewish people–THE SOVIET UNION.

Be it noted, however, that Mr. Bittleman admits indirectly that he is not speaking for all American Jews, particularly when he assails as “reactionary” the “non-democratic forces in Jewish life–such as the Sulzbergers, Rosenwalds, and Lazarons”. In addition to ideology, another factor in the devotion to their old homelands of so many of the newer American Jews of Eastern European source is kinship. According to The American Zionist Handbook, 68 to 70 % of United States Jews have relations in Poland and the Soviet Union.

Quite in harmony with the Bittleman attitude toward the Soviet was the finding of the Canadian Royal Commission that Soviet Russia exploits fully the predilection of Jews toward Cornmunism: “It is significant that a number of documents from the Russian Embassy specifically note ‘Jew’ or ‘Jewess’ in entries on their relevant Canadian agents or prospective agents, showing that the Russian Fifth Column leaders attached particular significance to this matter.”

In view of the above-quoted statement of a writer for the great New York publication, the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, which is described on its title-page as “authoritative”, and in view of the findings of the Canadian Royal Commission, not to mention other facts and testimonies, it would seem that no one should be surprised that certain United States Jews of Eastern European origin or influence have transmitted atomic or other secrets to the Soviet Union. Those who are caught, of course, must suffer the fate of spies, as would happen to American espionage agents abroad; but, in the opinion of the author, the really guilty parties in the United States are those Americans of native stock who, for their own evil purposes, placed the pro-Soviet individuals in positions where they could steal or connive at the stealing of American secrets of atomic warfare. This guilt, which in view of the terrible likely results of atomic espionage is really blood-guilt, cannot be sidestepped and should not be overlooked by the American people.

The presence of so many high-placed spies in the United States prompts a brief reference to our national habit (a more accurate term than policy) in regard to immigration. On December 2, 1823, President Monroe proclaimed, in the famous Doctrine which bears his name, that the American government would not allow continental European powers to “extend their system” in the United States. At that time and until the last two decades of the nineteenth century, immigration brought us almost exclusively European people whose ideals were those of Western Christian civilization; these people became helpers in subduing and settling our vast frontier area; they wished to conform to rather than modify or supplant the body of traditions and ideals summed up in the word “America”.

After 1880, however, our immigration shifted sharply to include millions of persons from Southern and Eastern Europe. Almost all of these people were less sympathetic than predecessor immigrants to the government and the ideals of the United States and a very large portion of them were non-Christians who had no intention whatever of accepting the ideals of Western Christian civilization, but had purposes of their own. These purposes were accomplished not by direct military invasion, as President Monroe feared, but covertly by infiltration, propaganda, and electoral and financial pressure. The average American remained unaware and unperturbed.

 

 

Let us move directly into finishing this section of The Iron Curtain Over America, “Russia and the Khazars”, by John Beaty. This is background that you MUST have if you are to make heads or tails from what is going on about you in your world today.

We were speaking of immigration shifts toward more and more non-Christian newcomers into the United States. These people had NO INTENTION to take up the ideals of your Western Christian civilization and what did YOU do about changing that? Nothing–you backed off even to the point where these have taken over your whole culture. You don’t even put “Christ” first in your pledge to religious unity–you say: “Judeo-Christian”, etc. The two are mutually exclusive, one is anti-Christ God and the other is pro-Christ God. YOU as a nation have taken up the cloak of the anti-Christ by your voting in that which is against God and natural Creation. Then you come and blast those who wish to remain in the path chosen as goodly and go forth and demand that your children be taught “safe sex” in the first grade. THESE ARE NOT THE RIGHT LAWS OF GOD OR NATURAL CREATION. These are the conjurings of Human beings to render you helpless slaves to the physical plane of which they are rulers! You MUST recognize the players involved.

 

IMMIGRANT PROBLEMS

QUOTING:

Among those who early foresaw the problems to be created by our new immigrants was General Eisenhower’s immediate predecessor as President of Columbia University. (Remember Eisenhower was a Jew.) In a small but extremely valuable book, The American As He Is, President Nicholas Murray Butler in 1908 called attention to “the fact that Christianity in some one of its many forms is a dominant part of the American nature.” Butler, then at the zenith of his intellectual power, expressed fear that our “capacity to subdue and assimilate the alien elements brought…by immigration may soon be exhausted.” [H: Please realize that often “Christian” is confused with “Christlike” and herein is where you begin to misunderstand. What you are dealing with in this subject immediately prior is the lack of “Christlike” beliefs and actions–not necessarily “Jesus-like”. The U.S. was birthed one nation UNDER GOD-not “one nation under JESUS”! To some of you this is the SAME–no–it is NOT! Christ represents a Godly goodly state of being. “Jesus” by any label was a MAN physical. The important perception is that one is spiritual being, the other is physical manifestation.] He concluded accordingly that “The dangers which confront America will come, if at all, from within.”

Statistics afford ample reasons for President Butler’s fears. The new immigration was comprised preponderantly of three elements: the Italians, the Slays, and the Jews. The Italians and the Slays were less assimilable than immigrants from Northern and Western Europe, and tended to congregate instead of distributing themselves over the whole country as the earlier Northern European immigrants had usually done.

The assimilation of Italians and Slays was helped, however, by their belonging to the same parent Indo-Germanic racial stock as the English-German-Irish majority, and above all by their being “Christian”–mostly Roman Catholics–and therefore finding numerous co-religionists not only among fully Americanized second and third generation Irish Catholics but among old stock Anglo-American Catholics descending from Colonial Days. Quite a few persons of Italian and Slavic stock were or became Protestants, chiefly Baptists–among them being ex-Governor Charles Poletti of New York and ex-Governor Harold Stassen of Minnesota. The new Italian and Slavic immigrants and their children soon began to marry among the old stock. In a protracted reading of an Italian language American newspaper, the author noted that approximately half of all recorded marriages of Italians were to persons with non-Italian names.

Thus in one way or another the new Italian and Slavic immigrants began to merge into the general American pattern. This happened to some extent everywhere and was notable in areas where the newcomers were not congregated–as in certain urban and mining areas–but were dispersed among people of native stock. With eventual complete assimilation by no means impossible, there was no need of a national conference of Americans and Italians or of Americans and Slays to further the interests of those minorities.

With the new Jewish immigrants, however, the developments were strikingly different–and quite in line with the fears of President Butler. The handful of Jews, mostly Sephardic and German, already in this country (about 280,000 in 1877), were not numerous enough to contribute cultural guidance to the newcomers. These newcomers arrived in vast hordes–especially from territory under the sovereignty of Russia, the total number of legally recorded immigrants from that country between 1881 and 1920 being 3,237,079, most of them Jews. Many of those Jews are now referred to as Polish Jews because they came from that portion of Russia which had been the kingdom of Poland prior to the “partitions” of 1772-1795 and was the Republic of Poland between World War I and World War II. Accordingly, New York City’s 2,500,000 or more Jews are sometimes said to be largely Polish Jews.

Thus by sheer weight of numbers, as well as by aggressiveness, the newcomer Jews from Eastern Europe pushed into the background the more or less Westernized Jews, who had mi-grated or whose ancestors had migrated to America prior to 1880 and had become for the most part popular and successful merchants with inordinate interest in politics. In striking contrast, the Eastern European Jew made himself a power to be reckoned with in the professions, the industries, and the political parties.

The overwhelming of the older Americanized Jews is well portrayed in The Jewish Dilemma by Elmer Berger. Of the early American Jews, Berger writes: “Most of these first 200,000 came from Germany. They integrated themselves completely.” This integration was not difficult; for many persons of Jewish religion in Western Europe in the nine- teenth century not only had no racial or ethnic connection with the Khazars, but were not separatists or Jewish nationalists. The old contentions of their ancestors with their Christian neighbors in Western Europe had been largely overlooked on both sides by the beginning of the nineteenth century, and nothing stood in the way of their full integration into national life. The American kinsmen of these Westernized Jews were similar in outlook.

But after 1880 and particularly in the first two decades of the twentieth century, immigration to the United States from Eastern Europe increased rapidly. The Eastern European immigrant Jews brought with them the worn out concept of “a Jewish people”. Soon these newcomers of nationalist persuasion actually exerted influence over the old and once anti-nationalist organization of American Reform Judaism. In the winter of 1941-’42 the Central Conference of American Rabbis had endorsed the campaign to organize a Jewish Army. The event indicated the capitulation of the leadership of Reform Judaism to Jewish Nationalism. Many American-minded Jews protested, but the voices were disorganized and therefore could be safely ignored. American Jewry had succumbed to the relentless pressure of the Zionists.

With the domination of American Jewry by Judaized Khazars and those who travel with them, the position of American Jews who wished to be American became most unhappy. The small but significant group which met at Atlantic City in June, 1942, to lay the foundations for an organization of Americans whose religion is Judaism, were at once pilloried. Charges of being “traitors”, “Quislings”, “betrayers” were thundered from the synagogues of America and filled the columns of the Jewish press. Many were silenced or won over by the pressure and the abuse–but not all. Those brave Jews who are persecuted because they are not hostile to the American way of life should not be confused with those Jews who persecute them, as Mr. Berger shows, but should on the other hand receive the sympathy of all persons who are trying to save Christian civilization in America.

Since the predominant new Jews consider themselves a superior people and a separate nationality, assimilation appears now to be out of the question. America now has virtually a nation within the nation, and an aggressive culture-conscious nation at that. [H: Remember, again, this was written about 40 (forty) years ago and every statement is backed up with documentation–mostly from the very works of the Jewish reference books. I am not going to take time to cite them all–but Mr. Beaty has cited them all.]

The stream of Eastern Europeans was diminished in volume during World War I, but was at flood level again in 1920. At last the Congress became sufficiently alarmed to initiate action. The House Committee on Immigration, in its report on the bill that later became the quota law of 1921, reported:

There is a limit to our power of assimilation…the processes of assimilation and amalgamation are slow and difficult. With the population of the broken parts of Europe headed this way in ever-increasing numbers, why not peremptorily check the stream with this temporary measure, and in the meantime try the unique and novel experiment of enforcing all of the immigration laws on our statutes?…. [H: The Jews today have NO TROUBLE AT ALL GETTING INTO THE U.S. AS CITIZENS–NONE WHATSOEVER–QUOTAS ARE IGNORED IN ALL INSTANCES.]

Accordingly, the 67th Congress passed the first quota law, which was approved on May 19, 1921, limiting the number of any nationality entering the United States to 3 percent of the foreign-born of that nationality who lived here in 1910. Under this law, approximately 350,000 aliens were permitted to enter each year, mostly from Northern and Western Europe.

The worry of the Congress over unassimilable aliens continued and the House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Sixty-eighth Congress reported that it was necessary to the successful future of our nation to preserve the basic strain of our population and continued as follows:

Since it is the axiom of political science that a government not imposed by external force is the visible expression of the ideals, standards, and social viewpoint of the people over which it rules, it is obvious that a change is the character or composition of the population must inevitably result in the evolution of a form of government consonant with the base upon which it rests. If, therefore, the principle of individual liberty, guarded by a constitutional government created on this continent nearly a century and a half ago, is to endure, the basic strain of our population must be maintained and our economic standards preserved.

….the American people do not concede the right of any foreign group in the United States, or government abroad, to demand a participation in our possessions, tangible or intangible, or to dictate the character of our legislation.

The new law changed the quota basis from 1910 to 1890, reduced the quotas from 3 to 2%, provided for the establishment of permanent quotas on the basis of national origin, and placed the burden of proof on the alien with regard to his admissibility and the legality of his residence in the United States. It was passed by the Congress on May 15, and signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 26, 1924. The new quota system was still more favorable relatively to the British Isles and Germany and other countries of Northern and Western Europe and excluded “persons who believe in or advocate the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States.” Unfortunately, within ten years, this salutary law was to be largely nullified by misinterpretation of its intent and by continued scandalous maladministration, a principal worry of the Congress in 1921 and continuously since.

By birth and by immigration, either clandestine or in violation of the intent of the “national origins” law of 1924, the Jewish population of the U.S. increased rapidly. The following official Census Bureau statement is of interest: “In 1877 there were at least 277 congregations in the country and 230,000 Jews; in 1890, 533 congregations and probably 475,000 Jews; in 1906, 1700 congregations and about 1,775,000 Jews; in 1916, 1900 congregations and about 3,300,000 Jews; in 1926, 3,118 permanent congregations and 4,081,000 Jews; and in 1936, 3,728 congregations and 4,641,184 Jews residing in the cities, towns and villages in which the congregations were located.” On other religions, the latest government statistics are mostly for the year 1947, but for the Jews the 1936 figure remains. As to the total number of Jews in the United States the government has no exact figures, any precise figures beyond a vague “over five million” being impossible because of incomplete records and illegal immigration. The Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, however, accepts the World Almanac figure of 15,713,638 Jews of religious affiliation in the world and summarizes thus: “statistics indicate that over 50 percent of the World Jewish population is now residing in the Western Hemisphere, i.e., at least 8,000,000. Since some three-fourths of a million Jews live in other North and South American countries besides the United States, the number of Jews known to be in the United States may be placed at a minimum of about 7,250,000. Jews unaffiliated with organizations whose members are counted, illegal entrants, etc., may place the total number in the neighborhood of 10,000,000. This likely figure would justify the frequently heard statement that more than a half of the Jews of the world are in the United States.

Percentage-wise this is the government summary of Jewish population in the United States:

In 1937, Jews constituted less than 4 percent of the American people, but during the 7-year period following (1937-1943), net Jewish immigration to the United States ranged between 25 and 77 percent of total net immigration to this country. For the 36-year period, 1908-1943, net Jewish immigration constituted 14 percent of total. The population of the United States has increased three-fold since 1877, while the Jewish population has increased twenty-one-fold during the same period. [H: Note the dates and then think again because during and after the war there were masses of Jews brought in without question. Also, following on with Russian Jews the immigration figures grow exponentially. With such figures showing exodus of Jews from the “War Zones” of Germany, Poland, etc., and starting with less than 6 million in that part of Europe–HOW CAN YOU HAVE LOLLED OVER 6 MILLION OF THEM, EX-PORTED TO PALESTINE, ETC., AT LEAST HALF THAT NUMBER, AND HAVE SO MANY RECEIVING DAMAGES FROM THE “HOLOCAUST” REGULARLY–HOW COULD THE “HOLOCAUST” BE CORRECT AS PROJECTED BY THE ZIONISTS?(???) It simply does not mathematically ADD UP. I don’t “knock” anybody’s favorite “Holocaust” but this one DOES NOT ADD UP. Especially as compared with the numbers of Christians deaded by the Khaz-arian Jew Bolshevik Communists–SOME 20 TO 60 MILLION!]

The above government figures require elucidation. The figures include only those Jews connected with an organized Jewish congregation and, as corollary, exclude the vast number of Jews, illegal entrants and others, who are not so connected, and hence not officially listed as Jews. The stated increase of Jews by 2100 percent since 1877 is thus far too small because non-Congregational Jews are not counted. Moreover, since the increase of 300 percent in the total population includes known Jews, who increased at the rate of 2100 percent, the increase in population of non-Jews is far LESS than the 300 percent increase of the total population.

This powerful and rapidly growing minority–closely knit and obsessed with its own objectives which are not those of Western Christian civilization–will in subsequent chapters be discussed along with other principal occupants of the stage of public affairs in America during the early 1950’s. Details will come as a surprise to many readers, who are the unwitting victims of censorship. After mentioning that the “secret ban” against publishing the truth on “Zionist Nationalism”, which ones such as author Douglas Reed holds “to be allied in its roots to Soviet Communism”, grew in his adult lifetime “from nothing into something approaching a low of lese majeste at some absolute court of the dark past”, Mr. Reed states further that “the Zionist Nationalists are powerful enough to govern governments in the great countries of the remaining West!” He concludes further that “American Presidents and British Prime Ministers, and all their colleagues”, bow to Zionism as if venerating a shrine.

The subject-matter of a book can be best determined not by its preface but by its index. It is believed that an examination of the index of The Iron Curtain Over America will show a unique completeness in the listing of names and subjects bearing upon the present period of our country. In brief, The Iron Curtain Over America presents in compressed detail–along with other matters–the problems created in the United States by a powerful minority possessed of an ideology alien to our traditions and fired by an ambition which threatens to involve us in the ruin of a third world-wide war. The next chapter deals with the aboveboard infiltration of Judaized Khazars, and other persons of the same ideology, into the United States Democratic Party.

 

 

THE KHAZARS JOIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

The triumphant Khazars, aided by other “converts” to Communism, strengthened their grasp on prostrate Russia by a succession of “purges” in which many millions of Russians lost their lives, either by immediate murder or in the slow terror of slave labor camps. These purges do not concern us here except as a sample of what Soviet rule would bring to America, namely, the slaying of 15,000,000 persons on a list already prepared by name and category (statement to the author by a former-high ranking international Communist who has deserted “Stalinism”). The lecturer, Matt Cveltic, a former F.B.I. undercover agent, gives more recently a much higher figure; he states that almost all men and women over thirty, having been found too old for “re-education”, would be slaughtered. For details, write to Borger News-Herald, Borger, Texas, asking reprint of We Owe a Debt (April 16, 1952) by J. C. Phillips.

Even as they subjected the Russian people to a rule of terror the new rulers of Russia promptly and effectively penetrated the countries of Western Europe and also Canada and (as was already shown) the United States. For their fateful choice of our country as a goal of their major though not yet completely and finally successful endeavor, there were several reasons.

In the first place, with its mutually advantageous capital-labor relations, its enormous productivity, and its high standard of living, the United States of America was an existing visible refutation of the black Soviet lie that their Communist dictatorship did more than our Republic for the workingman. The idea that the “capitalistic” democracies (Britain and America) were formidable obstacles to the spread of Communism and had to be destroyed was expressed many times by Soviet leaders and notably by Stalin in his great address (Moscow, March 10, 1939) to the 18th Congress of the Communist Party. This elaborate official statement of Soviet policy was made before the outbreak of World War II, and nearly three years before our involvement, and was trumpeted rather than hidden under a bushel. It can therefore be safely predicated that our State Department, with its numerous staffs, offices, bureaus, and divisions, was promptly aware of the contents of this speech and of the Soviet goal of overthrowing our “capitalist democracy”.

The second reason for large scale Communist exploitation of the United States was our traditional lack of any laws prohibiting or regulating immigration into the United States and our negligence or politics in enforcing immigration laws when they had been passed. “The illegal entry of aliens into the United States is one of the most serious and difficult problems confronting the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Since the end of World War II, the problem of illegal entry has increased tremendously. There is ample evidence that there is an alarmingly large number of aliens in the United States in an illegal status. Under the alien registration act of 1940 some 5,000,000 aliens were registered” (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, pp. 629, 630).

The third principal reason for the Communist exploitation of the United States was the absence of any effective policy regarding resident foreigners even when their activities are directed toward the overthrow of the government. Thus in 1950 several hundreds of thousands of foreigners, among the millions illegally in this country, were arrested and released for want of adequate provisions for deporting them.

As shown in Chapter II, above, persons of Khazar background or traditions had entered the United States in large numbers in the waves of immigration between 1880 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914. The Soviet seizure of Russia took place in 1917, however, and the hey-day for Communist-inclined immigrants from Eastern Europe was the five-year period between the end of World War I (1919) and the passage of the 1924 law restricting immigration. Recorded immigrants to this country in that brief span of time amounted to approximately three million and large numbers of the newcomers were from Eastern Europe.

Most significantly, with Communism in power in Russia, many of the new immigrants were not only ideologically hostile to the Western Christian civilization of which America was the finest development, but were actual agents of the new Rulers of Russia. Conspicuous among these was Sidney Hillman, who had turned from his “Rabbinical education” (Who Was Who in America, Vol. II, p. 254) to political activities of international scope. Twenty-two years before Franklin Roosevelt gave orders to “clear everything with Sidney”, similar orders were given American Communists by Lenin himself, Hillman being at the time President of the Russian-American Industrial Corporation at 103 E. Fourteenth St., New York.

Surely a relatively small number of Khazar immigrants from Russia came as actual Soviet agents; not all of them came as confirmed Marxists; and some of them have doubtless conformed to the traditional American mores. The contrary is neither stated nor implied as a general proposition. The fact remains, however, that the newer immigrants, to an even greater degree than their predecessors of the same stock, were determined to resist absorption into Western Christian civilization and were determined also to further their aims by political alignment and pressure.

In the first three decades of the twentieth century, few of the several million non-Christian immigrants from Eastern Europe were attracted to the Republican Party, which was a majority party with no need to bargain for recruits. The Democratic Party, on the contrary, was in bad need of additional voters. It had elected Woodrow Wilson by a huge electoral majority in 1912 when the Republican Party was split between the followers of William Howard Taft and those of Theodore Roosevelt, but the Democratic popular vote was 1,413,708 less than the combined Taft and Roosevelt votes. In fact, between 1892 (Cleveland election over Harrison) and 1932 (F.D. Roosevelt’s election over Hoover), the Democratic candidate had polled more presidential popular votes than the Republican candidate (9,129,606 to 8,538,221) only once, when Woodrow Wilson was elected (1916) to a second term on the slogan, “He kept us out of war.” In all the other elections, Republican majorities were substantial. Applying arithmetic to the popular vote of the seven presidential elections from 1904 to 1928 inclusive, it is seen that on the average, the Democrats, except under extraordinary circumstances, could not in the first three decades of the twentieth century count on as much as 45% of the votes.

In addition to its need for more votes, the Democratic Party had another characteristic which appealed to the politically-minded Eastern European newcomers and drew to its ranks all but a handful of those who did not join a leftist splinter party. Unlike the Republican Party, which still had a fairly homogeneous membership, the Democratic Party was a collection of several groups. The Democratic Party was not a political party at all; it was a marriage of convenience among assorted bedfellows, each of whom hated most of the others.

In the early part of the twentieth century the two largest components of the Democratic Party were .the rural Protestant Southerners and the urban Catholic Northerners, who stood as a matter of course for the cardinal principles of Western Christian civilization, but otherwise had little in common politically except an opposition, chiefly because of vanished issues, to the Republican Party. The third group, which had been increasing rapidly after 1880, consisted of Eastern Europeans and other “liberals”, best exemplified perhaps by the distinguished Harvard Jew, of Prague stock, Louis Dembitz Brandeis, whom President Woodrow Wilson, for reasons not yet full known by the people, named to the United States Supreme Court. This man, at once so able, and in his legal and other attitudes so far to the left for the America of 1916, deserves attention as a symbol of the future for the Democratic Party, and through that party, for America.

According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, there was an “historical battle” in the Senate in regard to “Brandeis’ ‘radicalism’,” and “his alleged ‘lack of judicial temperament’.” These alleged qualities provoked opposition to the nomination by seven former presidents of the American Bar Association, including ex-Secretary of State Elihu Root and ex-President William Howard Taft. [H: Go back and read that portion again! Bar Association???]

Despite the opposition, the nomination was confirmed by the Senate in a close vote on June 5, 1916. This was one of the most significant days in American history, for we had, for the first time since the first decade of the nineteenth century, an official of the highest status whose heart’s interest was in something besides the United States–an official, moreover, who interpreted the Law not as the outgrowth of precedent, but according to certain results desired by the interpreter.

The entire article on Justice Brandeis in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. pp. 495499) should be read in full, if possible. Here are a few significant quotations:

During the World War, Brandeis occupied himself with a close study of the political phases of Jewish affairs in every country. Since that time his active interest in Jewish affairs has been centered in Zionism. In 1919, he visited Palestine for political and organizational reasons … he has financed various social and economic efforts in Palestine.

As a justice, Mr. Brandeis:

Never worried about such academic perplexities as the compatibility of Americanism with a minority culture or a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Breaking away from the accepted legal catechisms, he thoroughly and exhaustively probed the economics of each and every problem presented. The truth of his conviction that our individualistic philosophy could not longer furnish an adequate basis for dealing with the problems of modern economic life, is now generally recognized … he envisages a co-operative order. Brandeis feels that the Constitution must be given liberal construction.

This may be taken as the beginning of the tendency of our courts to assume by judicial decisions the function of legislative bodies.

There is testimony, also, to the influence of Brandeis over Wilson as a factor in America’s entry into World War I and its consequent prolongation with terrible blood losses to all participants, especially among boys and young men of British, French, and German stock. Although Britain had promised self-rule to the Palestine Arabs in several official statements by Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, by Field Marshal Lord Allenby, Commander in Chief of British Military forces in the area, and by others, President Wilson was readily won over to a scheme concocted later in another compartment of the British government. This scheme, Zionism, attracted the favor of the Prime Minister, Mr. David Lloyd George, who, like Wilson, had with prominent Jews certain close relations, one of which is suggested in the Encyclopaedia Britannica article (Vol. XIX, p.4) on the first Marquess of Reading (previously Sir Rufus Daniel Isaacs). Thus, according to S. Landman, in his paper Secret History of the Balfour Declaration, after an “understanding had been arrived at between Sir Mark Sykes and Weizmann and Sokolow, it was resolved to send a secret message to Justice Brandeis that the British Cabinet would help the Jews to gain Palestine in return for active Jewish sympathy and support in U.S.A. for the allied cause so as to bring about a radical pro-ally tendency in the United States.” An article, “The Origin of the Balfour Declaration” (The Jewish Chronicle, February 7, 1936), is more specific. According to this source, certain “representatives of the British and French Governments” had been convinced that “the best and perhaps the only way to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine”. In so doing “the Allies would enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful force of Zionist Jewry in America and elsewhere.” Since President Wilson at that time “attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of Mr. Justice Brandeis”, the Zionists worked through him and helped to bring America in.

[H: Readers, you are going to be very remiss if you simply read these subjects as they fall without considering other happenings which impact on you to this day. Check out WHO was president and HOW came to be the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM! If you do not pay attention you will be left with fragments so disconnected that you can’t see the whole picture even though we have given all the pieces to the puzzle. Confusing? Of course–it is intended to confuse to the point of your inability to conceive the actions and players.]

The strange power of Brandeis over President Wilson is indicated several times in the book, Challenging Years, The Autobiography of Stephen Wise (G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1949). Rabbi Wise, for instance, spoke of Wilson’s “leaning heavily, as I well know he chose to do, on Brandeis,” and records a surprising remark by the supposedly independent-minded World War I President. To Rabbi Wise, who spoke of Zionism and the plans for convening “the first session of the American Jewish Congress”, Wilson said: “Whenever the time comes, and you and Justice Brandeis feel that the time is ripe for me to speak and act, I shall be ready.”

The authenticity of these statements, which are well documented in the sources from which they are quoted, cannot be doubted. Full evaluation of President Wilson will have to wait until the secret archives of World War I are opened to the public. Meanwhile, however, the management of the war in such a way as to bleed Europe to death casts persistent reflections upon the judgment if not the motives of President Wilson and Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain. Their bloody victory and their failure in peace stand in strong contrast to Theodore Roosevelt’s dramatic success in ending, rather than joining, the great conflict (1904-1905) between Russia and Japan.

After the eight-year rule of President Wilson, the Democratic Party was retired from office in the election of 1920. For the next twelve years (March 4, 1921-March 4, 1933), the three diverse groups in the party–Southern Protestants, Northern Catholics, and Brandeis-type “liberals”, were held loosely together by leaders who helped each other toward the day of victory and the resultant power and patronage. Tactfully accustomed to ask no questions of each other, these leaders, still mostly Southern Protestants and Northern Catholics, did not ask any questions of the Party’s rapidly increasing contingent of Eastern Europeans.

Thus the astute twentieth century immigrants of Eastern European origin continued to join the Democratic party, in which everybody was accustomed to strange bedfellows, and in which a largely non-Christian third force was already well intrenched. Parenthetically, the best description of the National Democratic party as it existed from the time of Franklin Roosevelt’s first term and on into the early 1950’s is probably that of Senator Byrd of Virginia. Speaking at Selma, Alabama, on November 1, 1951, he described the party as a “heterogeneous crowd of Trumanites” and added that the group, “if it could be called a party, is one of questionable ancestry, irresponsible direction and predatory purposes.”

Woodrow Wilson, who was definitely the candidate of a minority party, was elected in the first instance by a serious split in the Republican party. By constant reenforcement from abroad, however, the “third force” of Eastern Europeans and associates of similar ideology was instrumental in raising the Democratic party from a minority to a majority status. Some daring leaders of the alien or alien-minded wing conceived the idea of being paid in a special way for their contributions to victory.

Their price, carefully concealed from the American people, including of course many lesser figures among the Eastern Europeans, was the control of the foreign policy of the United States.

At a glance, the achievement of such an objective might seem impossible. In fact, however, it was easy, because it happens under our practice that the entire electoral vote of a State goes to the candidate whose electors poll a majority of the popular votes of the State. With the population of older stock somewhat evenly divided between the Republican and Democratic parties, a well-organized minority can throw enough votes to determine the recipient of the electoral vote of a state. The States having the largest numbers of Jews are New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Ohio, California, and Michigan. These, of course, are the “doubtful” states with a large electoral vote.

Thus when the ship of patronage came in with the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932, the Democrats of the old tradition, whether Southern Protestants or Northern Catholics, wanted dams, bridges, government buildings, and other government-financed projects in their districts; wanted contracts for themselves and their friends; and wanted also a quota of safe-tenure positions, such as federal judgeships. Neither group of old-time Democrats had many leaders who specialized in languages or in the complex subject matter of “foreign affairs”, and neither group objected to the seemingly modest interest of certain of the party’s Eastern European recruits for jobs of sub-cabinet rank in Washington.

The first spectacular triumph of the non-Christian Eastern European Democrats was Roosevelt’s recognition, less than nine months after his inauguration, of the Soviet government of Russia. A lengthy factual article, Moscow’s RED LETTER DAY in American History, by William La Varre in the American Legion Magazine (August, 1951), gives many details on our strange diplomatic move which was arranged by “Litvinov, of deceitful smiles” and by “Henry Morgenthau and Dean Acheson, both proteges of Felix Frankfurter”. Incidentally, Litvinov’s birth-name was Wallach and he also used the name Finkelstein. Three of the four persons thus named by Mr. La Varre as influential in this deal were of the same non-Christian stock or association–and the fourth was Dean Acheson, “who served as law clerk of Justice Louis D. Brandeis” before becoming famous as a “Frankfurter boy”. The principal “Frankfurter boy” is the subject of a most important article in the American Mercury magazine, April, 1952, 11 East 36th Street, New York 16, N.Y.). [H: This is an old magazine so these places may or may not still be valid addresses but the information will perhaps help you find the correct “copy” in libraries, etc.] The author, Felix Wittner, says in part:

Acheson’s record of disservice to the cause of freedom began at least nineteen years ago when he became one of Stalin’s paid American lawyers. Acheson was on Stalin’s payroll even before the Soviet Union was recognized by the United States. [H: Stop! Go read that again, please.]

Mr. La Varre’s article should be read in full, among other things, for its analysis of F.D. Roosevelt’s betrayal of Latin America to penetration by Communism. Bearing on the basic question of the recognition of the Soviet, here are significant quotations:

The very special agent from Moscow, Commissar of all the Red Square’s nefarious international machinations, chief of the Kremlin’s schemes for communizing the American hemisphere, sat victoriously at the White House desk at midnight, smiling at the President of the United States.

For Fifteen deceitful years the corrupt Kremlin had tried to obtain a Communist base, protected by diplomatic immunities, within the United States; four Presidents– Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover–had refused to countenance Moscow’s pagan ideology or its carriers. But here, at last, was a President the Communists could deal with.

Many patriotic, well-informed Americans, in the old Department of State, in the American Legion, and in the American Federation of Labor, had begged Franklin Roosevelt not to use his new leadership of the United States for the aggrandizement of an evil, dangerous and pagan guest–but to send him back to Moscow, red with the blood of the Commissar’s own countrymen, without a handshake.

But Franklin Roosevelt, piqued with the power of his new office, stimulated by the clique of Marxian and Fabian socialists posing as intellectuals and liberals–and by radicals in labor unions, universities, and his own sycophant bureaucracy–had signed his name to the Kremlin’s franchise. Without the approval of Congress, he made an actual treaty with the Soviets, giving them the right to establish a communist embassy and consulates in the United States, with full diplomatic hospitalities and immunities to Stalin’s agents, the bloody Bolsheviks…

November 16, 1933–at midnight! That is a date in American history our children will long have tragic cause to remember. That was the day Soviet Foreign Commissar Maxim Litvinov, plunderer of Estonia and the Kremlin’s first agent for socializing England, sat down with Franklin Roosevelt, after Dean Acheson and Henry Morgenthau had done the spadework of propaganda. and made the deal that has led the American people. and our once vast resources, into a social and economic calamity to the very brink,’ now, of national and international disaster….

One of the greatest concentrations of factual information, wise analyses, police records and military intelligence ever to pile up spontaneously on one subject in Washington, all documenting the liabilities of dealing with the Kremlin, had no effect on Franklin Roosevelt. He had appointed Henry Morgenthau and Dean Acheson, both protege’s of Felix Frankfurter, to “study” trade opportunities between the U.S.S.R. and the United States, and he praised their report of the benefits to come to all U.S. citizens from Soviet “friendship”.

The record shows that Cordell Hull, upon the receipt of this authentic document disclosing the Soviet’s continuing duplicity, sent a note of protest to Moscow, but President Roosevelt could not be persuaded to withdraw his diplomatic recognition. He began, instead, the “reorganization” of the State Department in Washington and the dispatching–to far, isolated posts–of its anti-communist career officers.

The Roosevelt-Stalin Deal, of November, 1933, has been so costly to us, as a nation and as a hemisphere, that the full appraisal of our losses and liabilities will not be known for several generations. The Kremlin’s gains within the United States and Communism’s cost to us is only now, in 1951–after eighteen years of suffering a Soviet embassy in our Capital. and its agents to roam the States–coming to public consciousness. [H: Still think there is no longer a Soviet Union to bother you cute little Americans, chelas? That was OVER 40 YEARS AGO!]

It has truly been a costly era of mysterious friendship for an appeasement of the devil, of un-American compromises with deceit and pagan ideologies. Some of its protagonists are now dead, their graves monuments to our present predicament, but others, again mysteriously, have been allowed to step into their strategic places.

Under the sort of government described by Mr. La Varre in his Legion article, large numbers of recently arrived and recently naturalized “citizens” and their ideological associates were infiltrated by appointment, or by civil service, into the State Department, the presidential coterie, and other sensitive spots in the government. Among those who feathered their Washington nests in this period were not only leftist East Europeans, but actual Communist converts or “sell-outs” to the Communist party among native Americans. The solicitude of President F.D. Roosevelt for America’s Communists was constant, as was shown in his steady opposition to proposed curbs upon them. Ex-Congressman Martin Dies, former Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities, bears witness in lectures (one of them heard by the author, 1950) that he was several times summoned to the White House by President Roosevelt and told–with suggestions of great favors to come–that he must stop annoying Communists. To the unyielding Dies, Roosevelt’s climactic argument was, “We need those votes!” A speech (May 17, 1951) on a similar theme by Mr. Dies has been published by the American Heritage Protective Committee. [H: No, this is not THE Heritage Foundation–the one in point was at 601 Bedell Building., San Antonio, Texas.] Another speech by Mr. Dies, White House Protects Communists in Government, was inserted (Sept. 22, 1950) in the Congressional Record by Congressman Harold H. Velde of Illinois.

The government was infiltrated with “risks” from the above described groups of Eastern Europeans and with contaminated native Americans, but those were not all. After the beginning of World War II, so-called “refugees” immediately upon arrival in this country were by executive order introduced into sensitive government positions without the formality of having them wait for citizenship, and without any investigation of their reasons for leaving Europe. The way for this infiltration was paved by an executive order providing specifically that employment could not be denied on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin.

Since no form of investigation could be made by the United States in the distant and hostile areas from which these refugees came, and since their number contained persons sympathetic to the Soviet Union, this executive order was a potential and in many instances a realized death-blow to security.

Almost as if for a double-check against security, the control of security measures in the new atom projects was not entrusted to the expert F.B.I., but to the atomic officials themselves. In view of their relative inexperience in such matters and in view of the amazing executive order so favorable to alien employees, the atomic officials were probably less to blame for the theft of atomic secrets than the “left-of-center” administrations which appointed them. Among those admitted to a proper spot for learning atomic secrets was the celebrated alien, the British subject–but not British-born–Klaus Fuchs. Other atomic spies, all aliens or of alien associations, were already named.

Next to the atomic energy employees, the United Public Workers of America offered perhaps the best opportunity for the theft of secrets vital to the U.S. defense. This union included a generous number of people of Eastern European stock or connections, among them Leonard Goldsmith and Robert Weinstein, organizers of Panama Canal workers, and both of them said to have definite Communist affiliations. This union–whose chief bloc of members was in Washington–was later expelled (March 1, 1950) by the C.I.O. on charges of being Communist-dominated. However, if the U.S. Government has shown any signs of being as particular about its employees as the C.L O. is about its members, the fact has escaped the attention of this author.

As the years passed, the infiltration of Eastern Europeans into the government had swelled to a torrent. Many of these persons, of course, were not Communists and were not sympathetic with Communist aims. As repeated elsewhere in this book, the contrary is neither stated nor implied. The author’s purpose is simply to show that persons of Eastern European stock, or of an ideology not influential in the days of the founding and formative period of our country, have in recent years risen to many of the most strategic spots in the Roosevelt-Truman Democratic Party and thereby to positions of great and often decisive power in shaping the policy of the United States. The subject was broached by W.M. Kiplinger in a book, Washington Is Like That. According to a Reader’s Digest condensation entitled The Facts About Jews in Washington, Jews were by 1942 conspicuously “numerous” in government agencies and departments concerned with money, labor, and justice. The situation stemmed from the fact that “non-Jewish officials within government, acting under the direction of the President”, were “trying to get various agencies to employ more Jews….”

The influence of persons of Eastern European origin, or of related origin or ideology, reached its peak (thus far) with Mr. Milton Katz at the helm of U.S. policy in Europe (to mid-1951); with Mrs. Anna Rosenberg in charge of the manpower of the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Corps; with Mr. Manly Fleischman as Administrator of the Defense Production Administration; and with Mr. Nathan P. Feinsinger (New York Times, August 30, 1951) as Chairman of the Wage Stabilization Board. Likewise, in October, 1948, when President Truman appointed a “committee on religious and moral welfare and character guidance in the armed forces”, he named as Chairman Frank L. Weil, of New York, a lawyer and President of the National Jewish Welfare Board.

It is interesting to note the prominence of persons of Khazar or similar background or association in the Socialist minority government of the United Kingdom, and in French politics, beginning with Leon Blum. Among them are the Rt. Hon. Emanuel Shinwell and Minister Jules Moch–archfoe of Marshal Petain–who have recently held defense portfolios in the British and French cabinets respectively. Just as in America the non-Christian characteristically joins the Democratic Party, so in Britain he joins the leftist Labor party. Thus the British House of Commons, sitting in the summer of 1951, had 21 Jews among its Labor members and none among its Conservative members. Whatever his racial antecedents, Mr. Clement Attlee, long leader of the British “Labor” Party and Socialist Prime Minister (1945-1951) has for many years received international notoriety as a Communist sympathizer. For instance, he visited and praised the “English company” in the international Communist force in the Spanish Civil War.

A few personas of Eastern European origin or background– or associated with persons of such background–in positions high or strategic, or both, have already been named by the author, and others, when their prominence demands it, will be named in the pages which follow, the author hereby assures the reader– again–that no reflection of any kind is intended and that he has no reason for believing that any of these people are other than true to their convictions. [H: Still having trouble believing that your U.S. Congress and all advisors, etc., are Khazarian Zionist in intent and basically Communistic in actions? The Congress of the U.S. is CONTROLLED, readers–good, bad or otherwise. Further, it is not even impacted by the “Christian” stance of birth of your nation under God and Christ values. This is WHY you have decadence beyond description and morals which have gone “south”. “America” defined as “the Kingdom of Heaven” as written yesterday–is in a sorry state of degradation!]

First on any list of Americans of Eastern European origin should be the Vienna-born Felix Frankfurter, [H: Keep remembering that just because this SOUNDS current–it was written in 1951 and a lot of years, manipulations and placements of HIGH LEVEL have constantly taken place.] who in the middle twentieth century appears to have replaced “the stock of the Puritans” as the shining light and symbol of Harvard University. After leaving his professorship in the Harvard Law School, Dr. Frankfurter became a Supreme Court Justice and President Franklin Roosevelt’s top-flight adviser on legal and other matters. In the formation of our national policies his influence is almost universally rated as supreme. “I suppose that Felix Frankfurter… has more influence in Washington than any other American,” wrote Rev. John P. Sheerin, Editor of The Catholic World, and the Chicago Tribune, owned by the Presbyterian Colonel Robert R. McCormick, has voiced a similar opinion. In fact, Mr. Justice Frankfurter is frequently referred to by those who know their way around Washington as the “President” of the United States. In a recent “gag”, the question, “Do you want to see a new picture of the President of the United States?” is followed up by showing a likeness of Frankfurther. [H: Sort of like the Billaries?]

Mr. Justice Frankfurter is influential not only in counsel but in furthering the appointment of favored individuals to strategic positions. The so-called “Frankfurter’s boys” include Mr. Acheson, with whom the justice takes daily walks, weather permitting; Alger Hiss; Lee Pressman; David Niles, long a senior assistant to president Truman; Benjamin V. Cohen, long Counselor of the Department of State; David Lilienthal, long Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission; John J. McCloy, Joe Rauh, Nathan Margold; Donald Hiss, brother to Alger, and “now a member of the Acheson law firm”; Milton Katz; and former Secretary of War Robert Patterons, “a hundred percent Frankfurter employee”. (All names and quotes in this paragraph are from Drew Pearson’s syndicated column, February 1, 1950).

A powerful government figure, the Russian-born Isador Lubin, was frequently summoned by President F.D. Roosevelt for the interpreting of statistics (“send for Lube”); and was subsequently a United States representative to the UN. Leo Pasvolsky, Russian-born, was long a power in the Department of State, being, among other things, “executive director, Committee on Postwar Programs, 1944”, and “in charge of international organization and security affairs”, 1945-1946. Among others very close to Roosevelt II were Samuel Rosenman, who is “special counsel” and said to write many of the President’s speeches; Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury and sponsor of the vicious Morgenthau Plan; and Herbert Lehman, Director General (1943 to 1946) of the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA), most of whose funds–principally derived from the U.S.–were diverted to countries which were soon to become Soviet satellites as a result of the Yalta and Potsdam surrenders.

Strategic positions currently or recently held by persons of Eastern European origin, or ideological association with such people, include a number of Assistant Secretaryships to members of the Cabinet, among them incumbents in such sensitive spots as Defense, Justice (Customs and Solicitor General’s Office) and Labor; the governorships of vital outposts such as Alaska (three miles from Russia) and the Virgin Islands (near the Panama Canal); appointments in the Executive Office of the President of the United States; positions in organizations devoted to international trade and assistance; membership on the Atomic Energy Commission; and membership, which may best be described as wholesale, in the U.S. delegation to the United Nations.

The number of persons of Eastern European origin or connection in appointive positions of strategic significance in our national government is strikingly high in proportion to the total number of such persons in America. On the contrary, in elective positions, the proportion of such persons is strikingly below their numerical proportion to the total population. The question arises: Does the high ratio of appointed persons of Eastern European origin or contacts in United States strategic positions reflect the will of the U.S. people? If not, what controlling WILL does it reflect?

* * *

Yes, it is lengthy–but people, your entire survival revolves around knowing what has happened to your government who now represents the CONTROL of your citizenry through the New States Constitution and the United Nations One World Order. What you do about your “survival” is about the only thing left for your deciding–the barn door is now locked, the stock got away and the barn is burning. What can you ACTUALLY do? Get right with GOD and BE PREPARED!

Salu.

 

For further interesting eBooks see here.